2026 Nissan Frontier

small pickup / Crew cab pickup

2026 Nissan Frontier Crew cab pickup

Crashworthiness

Rating overview
Evaluation criteriaRating
Small overlap front
G
Moderate overlap front: updated test
G
Side: updated test
A

Crash avoidance & mitigation

Evaluation criteriaRating
Headlights (varies by trim/option)
AM
Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0
Standard system
P
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Standard system
A

Seat belts & child restraints

Evaluation criteriaRating
Seat belt reminders
G
LATCH ease of use
M

Key

GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor

Small overlap front

The small overlap front evaluation consists of a driver-side and a passenger-side component. If the results of the two evaluations differ, then the combined small overlap rating is equal to the lower rating.

Driver-side

Tested vehicle: 2025 Nissan Frontier SV Crew cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2022-26 models

The Nissan Frontier was redesigned for the 2022 model year. Driver-side small overlap front ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2025 Frontier conducted by Nissan.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall driver-side evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID VTN2521
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 8
Footrest (cm) 11
Left toepan (cm) 11
Brake pedal (cm) 15
Parking brake (cm) 9
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 3
Upper occupant compartment
Steering column 9
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 6
Upper dash (cm) 6
Lower instrument panel (cm) 5

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID VTN2521
Head
HIC-15 114
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 1.2
Extension bending moment (Nm) 11
Maximum Nij 0.24
Chest maximum compression (mm) 27
Femur (kN)
Left 1.7
Right 1.6
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 4
Right 4
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0
Right 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.75
Right 0.73
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 3.2
Right 3.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 122
Right 95

Passenger-side

Tested vehicle: 2026 Nissan Frontier S Crew Cab 4-door 4wd
Rating applies to 2022-26 models

The Nissan Frontier was redesigned for the 2022 model year. Two passenger-side small overlap tests of the Frontier were conducted, one by the Institute and the other by Nissan. Ratings are based on both tests.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall passenger-side evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
M
Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Hip/thigh
G
Lower leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on passenger side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEP2603 VTP2522
Lower occupant compartment
Lower hinge pillar max (cm) 10 10
Footrest (cm) 15 16
Right toepan (cm) 22 11
Center toepan (cm) 13 11
Rocker panel lateral average (cm) 5 6
Upper occupant compartment
Center dash (cm) 4 2
Upper hinge pillar max (cm) 7 3
Upper dash (cm) 6 3
Right lower dash (cm) 6 2

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEP2603 VTP2522
Head
HIC-15 81 95
Peak gs at hard contact no contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.8 1.0
Extension bending moment (Nm) 14 12
Maximum Nij 0.22 0.23
Chest maximum compression (mm) 21 25
Femur (kN)
Left 2.2 2.2
Right 4.2 1.3
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 5 3
Right 2 3
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0 0
Right 2 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.59 1.09
Right 1.12 0.83
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 5.0 6.0
Right 3.6 3.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 136 123
Right 135 169

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test ID CEP2603 VTP2522
Head
HIC-15 40 69
Peak gs at hard contact no contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.8 0.9
Extension bending moment (Nm) 9 6
Maximum Nij 0.15 0.17
Chest maximum compression (mm) 30 30
Femur (kN)
Left 0.5 0.7
Right 0.9 1.0
Knee displacement (mm)
Left 1 1
Right 1 2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left 0 0
Right 0 0
Maximum tibia index
Left 0.40 0.38
Right 0.49 0.57
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left 0.8 0.9
Right 1.6 1.7
Foot acceleration (g)
Left 42 56
Right 51 56

About the small overlap front test

Moderate overlap front: updated test

Tested vehicle: 2022 Nissan Frontier S Crew Cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2022-26 models

The Nissan Frontier was redesigned for the 2022 model year.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
G
Thigh/hip
G
Leg/foot
G
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Chest
A
Thigh
G
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
A
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test IDCEF2218
Footwell intrusion
Footrest (cm)8
Left (cm)12
Center (cm)16
Right (cm)20
Brake pedal (cm)4
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm)0
Right (cm)2
Steering column movement
Upward (cm)3
Rearward (cm)-1
A-pillar rearward movement (cm)-1

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteriaMeasurement
Test IDCEF2218
Head
HIC-15371
Peak gs at hard contactno contact
Neck
Tension (kN)1.2
Extension bending moment (Nm)19
Maximum Nij0.21
Chest maximum compression (mm)28
Femur (kN)
Left1.7
Right0.8
Knee displacement (mm)
Left3
Right2
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%)
Left0
Right0
Maximum tibia index
Left0.39
Right0.72
Tibia axial force (kN)
Left2.7
Right3.4
Foot acceleration (g)
Left99
Right89

Rear passenger injury measures

Test IDCEF2218
Head
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Peak gs at hard contact61
Neck
Tension (kN)1.7
Compression (kN)1.3
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion
no contact
Chest
Chest index37
Shoulder belt tension (kN)4.4
Thigh (kN)
Left femur compression1.4
Right femur compression1.3

About the moderate overlap front test

February 2024 adjustment to rating criteria

Side: updated test

Tested vehicle: 2022 Nissan Frontier S Crew Cab 4wd
Rating applies to 2022-26 models

The Nissan Frontier was redesigned for the 2022 model year.

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
A
Structure and safety cage
G
Driver injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Driver head protection
G
Rear passenger injury measures
Head/neck
G
Torso
G
Pelvis
G
Rear passenger head protection
The dummy's head contacted the seat belt D-ring and C-pillar hard, through the side curtain airbag. The head protection is inadequate.
M
Technical measurements for this test

Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2228
B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) -20.5
Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline.

Driver injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2228
Head
HIC-15 64
Peak gs at hard contact no contact
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.3
Compression (kN) 0.3
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 20
Lateral force (kN) 0.9
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 25
Average deflection (mm) 20
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.20
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.19
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 2.8

Passenger injury measures

Evaluation criteria Measurement
Test ID CES2228
Head
HIC-15 427
Peak gs at hard contact 88
Neck
Tension (kN) 0.6
Compression (kN) 0.7
Shoulder
Lateral deflection (mm) 46
Lateral force (kN) 2.1
Torso
Maximum deflection (mm) 30
Average deflection (mm) 18
Maximum deflection rate (m/s) 3.96
Maximum viscous criterion (m/s) 0.33
Pelvis
Combined force (kN) 3.8

About the side crash test

Headlights

Ratings are given for 3 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.

(1) Trim level(s): Pro-X trim, Pro-4X trim

Evaluation criteriaRating
Low-beam headlight typeLED reflector
High-beam headlight typeLED reflector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
A
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Some glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created some glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on both right curves.

Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria Measurement
Trim level(s)
  • Pro-X trim
  • Pro-4X trim
Low-beam headlight type LED reflector
High-beam headlight type LED reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2022-26 models
A
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 90.4 m 12.5%
Straightaway left edge 61.7 m 12.5%
250m radius right curve, right edge 68.9 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 57.3 m 54.7%
150m radius right curve, right edge 56.9 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 57.9 m 59.4%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 162.5 m
Straightaway left edge 161.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 88.6 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 90.6 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 67.1 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 69.3 m

About the headlight evaluation

(2) Trim level(s): Pro-X trim, Pro-4X trim, SL trim

Evaluation criteriaRating
Low-beam headlight typeLED reflector
High-beam headlight typeLED reflector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?No
Overall rating
A
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination Some glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the sharp left and both right curves and fair on the gradual left curve.

The low beams created some glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.

Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria Measurement
Trim level(s)
  • Pro-X trim
  • Pro-4X trim
  • SL trim
Low-beam headlight type LED reflector
High-beam headlight type LED reflector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? No
Overall rating
Applies to 2023-26 models
A
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 90.4 m 12.5%
Straightaway left edge 61.7 m 12.5%
250m radius right curve, right edge 68.9 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 57.3 m 54.7%
150m radius right curve, right edge 56.9 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 57.9 m 59.4%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 162.5 m
Straightaway left edge 161.5 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 88.6 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 90.6 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 67.1 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 69.3 m

About the headlight evaluation

(3) Trim level(s): S trim, SV trim

Evaluation criteriaRating
Low-beam headlight typeLED projector
High-beam headlight typeLED projector
Curve-adaptive?No
High-beam assist?Yes
Overall rating
M
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination:
car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler car-simpler 0 ft 100 ft 200 ft 300 ft 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft Low beams Optimal low-beam illumination High beams Optimal high-beam illumination High-beam assist credit Some glare

Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on the left side of the road and fair on the right side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves.

The low beams created some glare.

High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was fair on the right side of the road and inadequate on the left side. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual right curve and fair on the sharp right and both left curves.

High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the straightaway, on both left curves and on the sharp right curve.

Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria Measurement
Trim level(s)
  • S trim
  • SV trim
Low-beam headlight type LED projector
High-beam headlight type LED projector
Curve-adaptive? No
High-beam assist? Yes
Overall rating
Applies to 2026 models
M
LOW BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Amount glare
exceeded threshold
Straightaway right edge 91.0 m None
Straightaway left edge 57.6 m None
250m radius right curve, right edge 74.0 m None
250m radius left curve, left edge 62.5 m 164.5%
150m radius right curve, right edge 54.9 m None
150m radius left curve, left edge 48.9 m 144.5%
HIGH BEAMS Average minimum useful
illumination distance (5 lux)
Straightaway right edge 132.8 m
Straightaway left edge 124.7 m
250m radius right curve, right edge 81.5 m
250m radius left curve, left edge 71.0 m
150m radius right curve, right edge 61.9 m
150m radius left curve, left edge 56.5 m

About the headlight evaluation

Front crash prevention: vehicle-to-vehicle 2.0

System details

  • standard AEB
Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
P
Rating applies to all 2026 models

Passenger car target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centeredCollision avoided
31 mph/target off-centerCollision avoided
37 mph/target centered28 mph
37 mph/target off-center28 mph
43 mph/target centered20 mph
43 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested

Motorcycle target

Test runSpeed reductionTimely warning?
31 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
31 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
37 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
37 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target centeredAutobrake not tested
43 mph/target off-centerAutobrake not tested

Semitrailer

Only warning is tested with the semitrailer.

Test runTimely warning?
31 mph/target centered
37 mph/target centered
43 mph/target centered

About the front crash prevention test

Front crash prevention: pedestrian

System details

  • standard Automatic Emergency Braking with Pedestrian Detection
  • of the following trim lines: S trim equipped with Technology package, SV trim equipped with Technology package
Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
A
Includes high-beam assist credit
Rating applies to 2024-26 models

Crossing child — day

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision.

Crossing adult — night

  • In the 12 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 19 mph.

Parallel adult — night

  • In the 25 mph test, this vehicle avoided a collision when using its high beams. When using its low beams, this vehicle avoided a collision.
  • In the 37 mph test, impact speed was reduced by 21 mph when using its high beams and a warning was issued 1.6 seconds before impact. When using its low beams, impact speed was reduced by 27 mph and a warning was issued 1.6 seconds before impact.

About the pedestrian front crash prevention test

Seat belt reminders

Rating applies to 2023-26 models

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
G
Front row
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
DurationLong enough (90+ seconds)
Volume
Audio frequency
Second row
Startup status alert (visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 60 seconds
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual)
Initiation time
Duration at least 30 seconds
Volume
Audio frequency
Technical measurements for this test
Evaluation criteria Measurement
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h 56 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h 73 dB
Difference between background and signal 16.6 dB
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h 63 dB
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h 79 dB
Difference between background and signal 16.5 dB
Dominant audio frequency 2000 Hz

About the seat belt reminder evaluation

Child seat anchors

Rating applies to 2026 models

Evaluation criteriaRating
Overall evaluation
M
Vehicle trimS
Seat type cloth

This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware. It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.

1 2 3
Rating iconRating
GGood
AAcceptable
MMarginal
PPoor
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated.
thether anchor symbol
Tether anchor
lower anchor symbol
Lower anchors
shared lower achors symbol
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s)
No hardware available

Details by seating position

PositionRating
1
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
2
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
none available
3
Tether anchor
hard-to-find location
other hardware could be confused for anchor
Lower anchors
not too deep in seat
too much force needed to attach
easy to maneuver around anchors
Technical measurements for this test

Seat position 21

3

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) could not measure
Clearance angle (degrees) 94
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) could not measure
Clearance angle (degrees) 100
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH
No

Seat position 22

2

Lower anchor A
No lower latch for this seat position
Lower anchor B
No lower latch for this seat position
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH
No

Seat position 23

1

Lower anchor A
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) could not measure
Clearance angle (degrees) 93
Lower anchor B
Open access rated No
Depth (cm) 0-2
Force (lbs) could not measure
Clearance angle (degrees) 97
Tether anchor
Location Back wall
Confusing hardware present Yes
Has contrasting label
within 3 inches of tether anchor
No
Tether anchors can be accessed
while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH
No

About the child seat anchor evaluation