Moderate overlap front: updated test
Tested vehicle: 2025 BMW i4 eDrive40 Gran Coupe 4-door
Rating applies to 2025 models
The BMW i4, an all-electric variant of the BMW 4-series, was introduced in the 2022 model year.
Evaluation criteria | Rating |
---|---|
Overall evaluation | |
Structure and safety cage | |
Driver injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Thigh/hip | |
Leg/foot | |
Driver restraints and dummy kinematics | |
Rear passenger injury measures | |
Head/neck | |
Chest | |
Thigh | |
Rear passenger restraints and dummy kinematics
|

View of the vehicle after the crash showing the airbags and damage to the occupant compartment.

The rear passenger dummy's head came close to contacting the front seatback, which increases the risk of head injuries.

Rear passenger dummy injury values indicate a low risk of injury to the head or neck and chest. During the crash, the shoulder belt remained in an ideal position on the dummy’s chest.

The rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.
Measures of occupant compartment intrusion on driver side
Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
---|---|
Test ID | CEF2538 |
Footwell intrusion | |
Footrest (cm) | 2 |
Left (cm) | 2 |
Center (cm) | 3 |
Right (cm) | 1 |
Brake pedal (cm) | 3 |
Instrument panel rearward movement | |
Left (cm) | 0 |
Right (cm) | 0 |
Steering column movement | |
Upward (cm) | 0 |
Rearward (cm) | -7 |
A-pillar rearward movement (cm) | 0 |
Driver injury measures
Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
---|---|
Test ID | CEF2538 |
Head | |
HIC-15 | 87 |
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 0.9 |
Extension bending moment (Nm) | 13 |
Maximum Nij | 0.20 |
Chest maximum compression (mm) | 26 |
Femur (kN) | |
Left | 0.5 |
Right | 0.4 |
Knee displacement (mm) | |
Left | 1 |
Right | 2 |
Knee-thigh-hip injury risk (%) | |
Left | 0 |
Right | 0 |
Maximum tibia index | |
Left | 0.26 |
Right | 0.23 |
Tibia axial force (kN) | |
Left | 1.5 |
Right | 1.9 |
Foot acceleration (g) | |
Left | 46 |
Right | 49 |
Rear passenger injury measures
Test ID | CEF2538 |
---|---|
Head | |
HIC-15 for head contact during forward excursion |
no contact
|
Peak gs at hard contact | no contact |
Neck | |
Tension (kN) | 1.8 |
Compression (kN) | 0.6 |
Maximum Nij for head contact during forward excursion |
no contact
|
Chest | |
Chest index | 35 |
Shoulder belt tension (kN) | 3.7 |
Thigh (kN) | |
Left femur compression | 0.1 |
Right femur compression | 0.1 |
Headlights
Ratings are given for 2 different headlight variations available on this vehicle.
(1) Trim level(s): eDrive35 trim equipped with Shadowline package, eDrive40 trim equipped with Shadowline package, xDrive40 trim equipped with Shadowline package, M50 trim
Evaluation criteria | Rating |
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams created some glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good on the gradual left curve and fair on the sharp left and both right curves.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the sharp left curve.
Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
---|---|
Trim level(s) |
|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating Applies to 2025 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 105.1 m | None |
Straightaway left edge | 69.8 m | None |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 70.1 m | 88.2% |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 71.2 m | 115.6% |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 61.3 m | 71.6% |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 58.6 m | 15.6% |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 110.8 m |
Straightaway left edge | 88.8 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 70.5 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 75.1 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 60.5 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 63.9 m |
(2) Trim level(s): eDrive35 trim, eDrive40 trim, xDrive40 trim
Evaluation criteria | Rating |
---|---|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating | |
Distance at which headlights provide at least 5 lux illumination: |
Low beams
On the straightaway, visibility was good on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was good in all 4 tests.
The low beams created excessive glare.
High beams
On the straightaway, visibility was inadequate on both sides of the road. On curves, visibility was fair in all 4 tests.
High-beam assist compensates for some limitations of this vehicle's low beams on the gradual left curve.
Evaluation criteria | Measurement |
---|---|
Trim level(s) |
|
Low-beam headlight type | LED projector |
High-beam headlight type | LED projector |
Curve-adaptive? | No |
High-beam assist? | Yes |
Overall rating Applies to 2025 models |
LOW BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
Amount glare exceeded threshold |
---|---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 113.5 m | 27.8% |
Straightaway left edge | 83.0 m | 27.8% |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 70.4 m | 119.7% |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 69.2 m | 98.8% |
150m radius right curve, left edge | 62.5 m | 173.8% |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 61.5 m | 9.3% |
HIGH BEAMS | Average minimum useful illumination distance (5 lux) |
---|---|
Straightaway right edge | 108.1 m |
Straightaway left edge | 84.9 m |
250m radius right curve, right edge | 68.6 m |
250m radius left curve, left edge | 69.4 m |
150m radius right curve, right edge | 60.3 m |
150m radius left curve, left edge | 60.8 m |
Front crash prevention: pedestrian
Seat belt reminders
Rating applies to 2025 models
Evaluation criteria | Rating |
---|---|
Overall evaluation | |
Front row | |
Unbelted occupant alert (audible & visual) | |
Initiation time | |
Duration | Long enough (90+ seconds) |
Volume | |
Audio frequency | |
Second row | |
Startup status alert (visual) | |
Initiation time | |
Duration at least 60 seconds | |
Belt disengaged alert (audible & visual) | |
Initiation time | |
Duration at least 30 seconds | |
Volume | |
Audio frequency |
Background cabin sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 51 dB |
Audible signal sound pressure level at 24 km/h | 58 dB |
Difference between background and signal | 6.1 dB |
Background cabin sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 54 dB |
Audible signal sound pressure level at 40 km/h | 58 dB |
Difference between background and signal | 4.2 dB |
Dominant audio frequency | 584 Hz |
Child seat anchors
Rating applies to 2025 models
Evaluation criteria | Rating |
---|---|
Overall evaluation | |
Vehicle trim | eDrive40 |
Seat type | leatherette |
This vehicle has 2 rear seating positions with complete child seat attachment (LATCH) hardware. It has 1 additional seating position with a tether anchor only.
Rating icon | Rating |
---|---|
G | Good |
A | Acceptable |
M | Marginal |
P | Poor |
Seating positions that rely on borrowed lower anchors or have only a tether anchor available are not rated. | |
thether anchor symbol | Tether anchor |
lower anchor symbol | Lower anchors |
Lower anchor(s) can be borrowed from adjacent positions(s) | |
No hardware available |
Details by seating position
Position | Rating |
---|---|
1 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors | |
2 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
none available | |
3 | |
Tether anchor | |
easy-to-find location | |
no other hardware could be confused for anchor | |
Lower anchors | |
not too deep in seat | |
not too much force needed to attach | |
easy to maneuver around anchors |
Seat position 21
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 68 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 65 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Yes |
Seat position 22
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
No lower latch for this seat position | |
Lower anchor B | |
No lower latch for this seat position | |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Yes |
Seat position 23
Lower anchor A | |
---|---|
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 63 |
Lower anchor B | |
Open access rated | Yes |
Depth | Visible |
Force (lbs) | 0 |
Clearance angle (degrees) | 66 |
Tether anchor | |
Location | Middle seatback |
Confusing hardware present | Yes |
Has contrasting label within 3 inches of tether anchor |
Yes |
Tether anchors can be accessed while seatback is properly positioned for use of LATCH |
Yes |